The Accuracy and Sincerity of the Science of Secrets
Munyiddin Ibn Arabi, while emphasizing the importance of the accuracy and innocence of those who explain the science of secrets, highlighted the expectations of different audiences. For ordinary people (the masses), these qualities are an indispensable condition; however, intelligent and sincere individuals question not personal accuracy but the content itself when evaluating knowledge. This approach acknowledges subjectivity in knowledge, allowing each individual to approach information with their own reason, thus opening the way for critical thinking and diverse interpretations.
Knowledge Not Requiring Affirmation
Ibn Arabi’s teaching offers flexibility regarding accepting or rejecting knowledge; the listener is neither obligated to affirm it nor to deny it. This allows one to evaluate whether the information is possible rather than accepting it as an absolute truth. As long as the information does not violate the principles of Sharia and does not contradict what reason deems impossible, even if brought by a scholar, it can be questioned and a decision can be made after reflection. This approach encourages a continuous evaluation process, in contrast to dogmatic approaches.
The Principle of Justice and Reliability
Ibn Arabi states that the acceptability of the information presented is increased if the person presenting it is just and reliable. In such cases, it can even be accepted as testimony and used in legal decisions. However, when information is associated with a lack of justice, its validity must be evaluated according to different criteria. This demonstrates that the character of the person conveying the information can affect the value of the knowledge; because reliability is an important element in reaching accurate information.